Talk:Cubital fossa

Anatomy: Gross Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.

radial nerve

A page of mnemonics is referenced for inclusion of the radial nerve. I don't think this source is reliable.--Taylornate (talk) 15:58, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The radial nerve is included as part of the cubital fossa in BRS Gross Anatomy, 7th edition (Chung and Chung) and Clinically Oriented Anatomy, 5th edition (Moore and Dalley). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flojoloco (talk • contribs)

Moore would be a good source.--Taylornate (talk) 04:43, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cubital fossa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060924192439/http://www.frca.co.uk/article.aspx?articleid=100363 to http://www.frca.co.uk/article.aspx?articleid=100363

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:28, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Definition or misspelling of 'hormid' from blurb

The first sentence of this article currently includes the word "hormid", which has no definition in wiktionary nor at a quick google search.

Should it be replaced with a different word that is easier to define, or is it possibly spelled incorrectly?

Thank you for your attention. 40.134.136.158 (talk) 19:58, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was added in this edit. I'm guessing they meant hominid. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:10, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Repaired to earlier edit Iztwoz (talk) 21:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]